Second Distribution Transformer Analysis

We have analyzed 26 distribution transformers in DC, Maryland, Virginia, Iowa, Helsinki, and New Hampshire. This analysis builds on the foundation set in the initial distribution transformer analysis; of most relevance is the section "What are we looking for?", and the separate overview that discusses the physical phenomena behind a transformer's acoustics.

The observations below of distribution transformers show that.

Selecting the Right Fourier

Fourier transforms combine many different parameters, and selecting them for the situation is a form of art. Fourier transforms are primarily categorized by the frame size (how many samples we're looking at). While padding zeros in the data allows for greater precision when determining the underlying frequencies (since it increases the frame size), it does not offer greater accuracy — the same result could be determined through interpolation.

Frame Size (Fourier Frequency)

The Fourier transform is subject to a basic tradeoff that is similar to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (in German, "the unsharpness relation") which says that you can know when something happened or what something was, but not both. In this context, as we increase the accuracy of the frequency, we decrease the accuracy of the time.

Knowing this, we can look at a pole-mounted transformer hoisted 20 feet in the air. There was considerable background noise at the time from local landscaping equipment. This recording was made at a 44.1 kHz sampling rate. If we supply 44,100 data samples (one second's worth of data — performing a Fourier transform at a rate of 1 Hz), we have a hard time making out the 120 Hz tone that is characteristic of transformers.

Parameter	Value
Sampling Rate	44.1 kHz
Frame Duration	1 second
Frequency Step	1 Hz

 

Given that our Fourier transforms have smaller frame sizes, we can make more sense of a longer period of time. The Y-axis is time, the X-axis is frequency, and the color is the relative volume in decibels (relative to the loudest noise). We are able to make out the loud activity of the landscaping equipment and can see every time the spinning blades slow down when they cut through brush.

There is a subtle line marking 120 Hz, but it's tough to get anything useful out of it. We can increase the frame size to increase the accuracy and precision of the frequencies in the data. In the below graph, we decrease the frequency of our Fourier transforms to be one every 100 seconds, increasing the frame size to 4,410,000 samples. As you can see below, we sacrifice our ability to detect when something is happening:

Parameter	Value
Sampling Rate	44.1 kHz
Frame Duration	100 seconds
Frequency Step	0.01 Hz

But we gain the ability to see what we're listening to (this is the Fourier transform of the first 100 seconds):

In the above graph, we can see quite clearly that there is a strong 120 Hz tone. The wide peaks mean that the frequency was wavering over the time period of the frame, and the sharp peak of the 120 Hz tone implies stability.

This serves as a single example demonstrating how to effectively extract a signal that is otherwise hidden among the noise, and it is the primary tool for combatting loud environments and interfering noise.

Harmonic Deviation

Parameter	Value
Sampling Rate	44.1 kHz
Frame Duration	100 seconds
Frequency Step	0.01 Hz

Previously, we looked at the relative strength of a harmonic, asking how many standard deviations above the mean a given frequency was above the mean of its surrounding frequencies. An example distribution of a Virginia substation is below. It was recorded from the grass 20 feet from the fence, which is another 40 feet from the transformers.

Our next question introduces a new analytical technique, asking whether these frequencies are actual peaks.

1. We start with a fundamental frequency that is determined by finding the peak value within a given sideband of 120 Hz.
2. We then calculate the harmonics by multiplying the identified fundamental (e.g. 120.02 Hz) by the harmonic number (1, 2, 3, ...). This gives us a "calculated harmonic".
3. Then, we observe which frequency is the highest within a sideband (e.g. 0.5 Hz) of the calculated harmonic. This gives us our "actual harmonic".
4. We subtract the actual harmonic from the calculated harmonic to get the deviation.
5. The results are plotted.

Sideband of 0.25 Hz

With a sideband of 0.25 Hz, the substation's harmonic deviation starts out very small, but quickly grows after the 10th harmonic, where the deviations are larger but still grouped between -0.1 and 0.1. We can see another dispersal occur after the 35th harmonic, where it becomes truly random.

While this may suggest that the calculated peaks are no longer useful beyond the 10th harmonic, expanding our sideband view offers a different perspective. The presence of max and min values (0.25 and -0.25) of deviation here imply that we are stuck in troughs, and that the true peak lies outside that restriction.

Sideband of 10 Hz

If we allow a 10 Hz sideband to find a peak frequency, we can see more encouraging results, which show strong and consistent harmonics that deviate very little from the calculated harmonics through the 21st harmonic.

Class Evaluation of Harmonic Deviation

Looking at the 26 transformers as a class, we can now measure how deep the harmonics go before beginning to significantly, with a metric known as harmonic depth. Given the relationship between harmonics, distortion, and transformer overloading, we expect this metric to be the primary metric that determines how overloaded a transformer is.

We can see that the harmonic depth of the transformers is evenly distributed across the range, but we have one outlier: transformer #25 with a harmonic depth of 67. This transformer is from Iowa City, IA and is located next a restaurant called the Hamburg Inn.